Every few years, Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) forces investors to re-decide what kind of company it really is.
Is it a mature advertising cash machine, or a capital-intensive technology builder chasing the next platform?
After the metaverse detour and the brutal reset of 2022–2023, investors are once again wondering where the company is headed. The difference now is that Meta is approaching its next ambition from a position of operational strength.
The last time Meta asked markets for patience, it burned through credibility as quickly as it burned cash.
Today, the company is still spending aggressively, but the context has changed. Revenues are growing, margins have recovered, and the core business is generating cash flow.
It’s not about survival now, but whether this next big bet will pay off or not.
The advertising engine is stronger than it looks
At the centre of any serious analysis on Meta sits advertising.
More than 98% of revenue still comes from ads, and that concentration is not a weakness in the current environment.
Digital advertising has quietly recovered from the post-pandemic slowdown, and Meta has benefited more than most.
The company enters 2026 with clear momentum. Management guided to fourth-quarter revenue growth of 17-24%, while external trackers suggest the holiday season ran hotter than expected.
It must be noted that Meta has a recent habit of beating the top end of its own guidance.
This is not a speculative story driven by distant promises. It is a company generating close to $200 billion in annual revenue, with earnings power that looks more predictable than it did two years ago.
AI has played a real role here, not as marketing buzz, but as an efficiency tool. Improvements in ad targeting, ranking, and measurement have allowed Meta to extract more value per impression even as regulatory constraints remain tight.
While competition from TikTok and retail media continues, Meta’s scale still gives it a structural edge. The platforms are saturated, but monetization is not.
From a macro angle, advertising tends to follow nominal growth and corporate sentiment, not abstract innovation cycles.
If global growth slows modestly but avoids recession, Meta’s ad business remains well supported.
In that scenario, the downside risk to earnings looks limited unless regulation or competition suddenly turns hostile.
Spending is rising again, but this time with discipline
Investors are understandably nervous about Meta’s spending plans for 2026.
Capital expenditure is set to rise sharply as the company builds out data centers and AI infrastructure. The memory of the metaverse years is still fresh, when spending ran far ahead of returns and management seemed insulated from consequences.
The difference now is that cost control has already been demonstrated. Reality Labs remains deeply loss-making, with operating losses north of $17 billion, but headcount reductions of 10-15% show that this unit is no longer sacred.
According to recent reports, Meta is planning to layoff 1500 people from its Metaverse division.
That alone could free up hundreds of millions in annual savings. More importantly, it signals that Meta is willing to admit when an experiment is not scaling fast enough.
The renewed investment focus sits elsewhere.
Meta Compute, large-scale data centers, and long-term power sourcing are designed to support AI workloads that already exist, not speculative virtual worlds.
Zuckerberg’s stated ambition to move from roughly 5 gigawatts of capacity today to tens of gigawatts over the decade is bold, but it aligns with what peers are doing.
The nuclear power agreements are not ideological statements. They are a response to a real constraint that AI is energy-hungry, and grid access has become a competitive bottleneck.
But all this is rational behavior. Energy, compute, and land availability are becoming strategic assets for technology companies, much like distribution once was.
Meta is trying to lock in optionality early, even if returns are back-loaded.
That does not guarantee success, but it is a clearer economic bet than the metaverse ever was.
Wearables and AI are optionality, not the core thesis
AR glasses and consumer AI features attract headlines, but they should not be treated as the central reason to own the stock.
The Ray-Ban glasses appear to be selling better than expected, and potential production increases with EssilorLuxottica suggest real consumer interest.
Over time, this could evolve into a meaningful hardware platform.
However, in financial terms, this remains an optional upside. Even optimistic scenarios do not move the needle on Meta’s income statement in the next two years.
The same applies to generative AI products embedded across Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp.
These features improve engagement and ad performance, but they do not yet create a new revenue category.
This framing is important for valuation discipline. Meta does not need AR glasses or consumer AI to justify its current earnings multiple.
They are call options layered on top of a mature, profitable base.
That reduces the risk of disappointment. If these bets fail, Meta is still a dominant advertising company with enormous cash flow. If they succeed, upside emerges without requiring heroic assumptions.
Valuation, risks, and the bull case in plain terms
At around the low $600s, Meta trades at a premium to its own history, but not at an extreme level given expected earnings of roughly $29 per share.
The market is effectively pricing Meta as a high-quality large-cap growth company with elevated capital intensity. That is a fair description.
The main risks are familiar. Regulatory pressure never disappears, especially in Europe.
Heavy AI spending could outpace monetization if the global economy weakens. Competition for attention remains fierce.
These are not theoretical concerns, but they are also not new ones.
Recent reports revealed that Meta earns substantial revenue from ads linked to fraudulent content, raising ethical and platform safety concerns.
The bull case rests on something simpler. Meta has restored its operating discipline, its core business is growing again, and its next investment cycle is tied to infrastructure that the entire industry agrees is necessary.
In that context, being bullish does not require believing in science fiction. It requires believing that Meta can keep executing at a level it has already shown in the past two years.
Rosenblatt analyst Barton Crocket says:
“Meta’s recent moves look deliberate and sensible, positioning the company to support long-term AI ambitions while managing spending fears.”
The analyst has issued a “Buy” rating with a $1117 price forecast, which implies more than 70% upside from the current price.
From a fundamental, macro-aware perspective, that assessment is not irrational. Meta is not cheap, but it is credible again. In markets like this, credibility is often the most underappreciated asset.
The post Should investors be bullish on Meta as it prepares for another big pivot? appeared first on Invezz